Author Archive

Women’s D1 & D2 Rankings – March 11, 2016

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • Women’s D1 Rankings – March 11, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly (125 pts)
    • 2. UC Davis (121)
    • 3. UCLA (114)
    • 4. UCSD (106)
    • 5. UCSB (95)
    • 6. Sonoma St (89)
    • 7. Santa Clara (88)
    • 8. Arizona (87)
    • 9. Stanford (79)
    • 10. San Diego St (71)
    • 11. Long Beach (62)
    • 12. LMU (58)
    • 13. USC (56)
    • 14. Cal (56)
    • 15. Chico St (51)
    • 16. San Jose St (28)
    • 17. Arizona St (26)
    • 18. San Diego (25)
    • 19. Fullerton (21)
    • 20. UC Irvine (18)
    • 21. Nevada-Reno (10)
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – March 11, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly II (153 pts)
    • 2. USF (152)
    • 3. UC Davis II (145)
    • 4. UCSB II (138)
    • 5. Point Loma (117)
    • 6. Azusa Pacific (116)
    • 7. UCLA II (112)
    • 8. San Francisco St (109)
    • 9. Sacramento St (106)
    • 10. USC II (93)
    • T11. Fresno St (86)
    • T11. Claremont (86)
    • T13. Riverside (85)
    • T13. San Diego St II (85)
    • 15. Pomona (78)
    • 16. Sonoma St II (75)
    • 17. St. Mary’s (72)
    • 18. Northridge (49)
    • 19. Nevada-Reno II (47)
    • T20. UC Irvine II (38)
    • T20. San Marcos 38
    • 22. Channel Islands (34)
    • 23. Fullerton II (33)
    • 24. San Jose St II (27)
    • 25. Pacific (18)
    • 26. Mount St. Mary’s (14)
  • Rankings for this period include all-league play up to 3/10/16, the Far Westerns Tournament at UC Davis, the MLK Tournament at San Jose St, and preseason results.
  • Las Vegas Open is March 18-19, 2016.
  • A point system is used in reverse order of ranking.  That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on.  Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.

Women’s D1 & D2 Rankings, February 27, 2016

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • Women’s D1 Rankings – February 27, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly (125 pts)
    • 2. Davis (121)
    • 3. UCLA (112)
    • 4. Sonoma St (101)
    • 5. UCSB (97)
    • 6. UCSD (94)
    • 7. Stanford (90)
    • 8. Arizona (88)
    • 9. Santa Clara (78)
    • 10. San Diego St (74)
    • 11. USC (72)
    • 12. Chico St (61)
    • 13. Cal (50)
    • 14. LMU (43)
    • T15. Long Beach (37)
    • T15. Arizona St (37)
    • 17. San Jose St (34)
    • 18. Fullerton (23)
    • 19. San Diego (22)
    • 20. Irvine (14)
    • 21. Nevada-Reno (13)
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – February 27, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly II 151 (pts)
    • 2. USF (150)
    • 3. Davis II (149)
    • 4. UCSB II (119)
    • 5. San Francisco St (116)
    • 6. Point Loma (113)
    • 7. Azusa Pacific (112)
    • 8. St. Mary’s (106)
    • 9. Sacramento St (103)
    • 10. UCLA II (96)
    • 11. Fresno St (94)
    • 12. Claremont (93)
    • T13. San Diego St II (84)
    • T13. Sonoma St II (84)
    • 15. USC II (76)
    • 16. Cal Poly Pomona (75)
    • 17. Riverside (70)
    • 18. Nevada-Reno II (69)
    • 19. San Marcos (47)
    • 20. Fullerton II (37)
    • 21. Northridge (36)
    • 22. Irvine II (34)
    • 23. San Jose St II (33)
    • 24. Channel Islands (28)
    • 25. Pacific (19)
    • 26. Mount St. Mary’s (7)
  • Rankings for this period include all-league play up to 2/26/16, the Far Westerns Tournament at UC Davis, the MLK Tournament at San Jose St, and preseason results.
  • Regional play in So-Cal this weekend so ranking changes coming heading into the Las Vegas Open.
  • A point system is used in reverse order of ranking.  That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on.  Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.
   

Women’s Far Westerns Finishes

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

Congrats to Cal Poly for defeating UC Davis, the top ranked team in California, to win the 2016 Far Westerns Tournament at UC Davis.  The post/pre tournament results are below.
  • Post/Pre Tournament Seeds
    • 1/2 Cal Poly – Tournament Champion
    • 2/1 UC Davis
    • 3/12 Sonoma St.
    • 3/15 Colorado-Boulder
    • 5/5 UCLA
    • 5/6 UCSB
    • 5/7 Stanford
    • 5/11 Santa Clara
    • 9/3 UCSD
    • 9/4 Oregon
    • 9/8 USC
    • 9/10 San Diego St
    • 9/20 Cal Poly II
    • 9/21 USF
    • 9/24 UC Davis II
    • 9/25 Oregon II
    • 17/13 Chico St – Silver Champion
    • 18/14 – Oregon St.
    • 19/9 – UC Berkeley
    • 19/30 – Colorado-Boulder II
    • 21/17 – San Jose St.
    • 21/18 – Nevada-Reno
    • 21/22 – San Francisco St
    • 21/31 – Fresno St.
    • 25/27 – St. Mary’s – Bronze Champion
    • 26/16 – Colorado Springs
    • 27/26 – Sacramento St.
    • 27/28 – Nevada-Reno II
    • 29/19 – UCSB II
    • 29/23 – USC II
    • 29/29 – Sonoma St. II

Women’s D1 & D2 February 12, 2016 Rankings

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • Women’s D1 Rankings – February 12, 2016
    • 1. Davis (125)
    • 2. UCLA (114)
    • 3. Cal Poly (111)
    • 4. UCSB (108)
    • 5. Arizona (100)
    • 6. Santa Clara (96)
    • 7. Stanford (83)
    • 8. UCSD (79)
    • 9. Cal (69)
    • 10. Chico St (68)
    • 11. Sonoma St (67)
    • 12. San Diego St (62)
    • T13. San Jose St (43)
    • T13. Arizona St (43)
    • T13. Long Beach (43)
    • 16. USC (42)
    • 17. LMU (40)
    • 18. Fullerton (32)
    • 19. Irvine (29)
    • 20. Nevada-Reno (17)
    • 21. San Diego (15)
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – February 12, 2016
    • 1. Davis II (159 pts)
    • 2. Cal Poly II (152)
    • 3. USF (146)
    • 4. Sacramento St (140)
    • 5. UCSB II (135)
    • 6. Fresno St (123)
    • 7. UCLA II (118)
    • 8. Azusa Pacific (115)
    • 9. Sonoma St II (108)
    • 10. St. Mary’s (103)
    • 11. San Francisco St (93)
    • 12. San Diego St II (90)
    • 13. Claremont (88)
    • 14. Point Loma (81)
    • 15. Irvine II (68)
    • T16. San Jose St II (65)
    • T16. Riverside (65)
    • 18. Nevada-Reno II (63)
    • 19. San Marcos (61)
    • 20. USC II (57)
    • 21. Pomona (52)
    • 22. Fullerton II (46)
    • T23. Northridge (39)
    • T23. Pacific (39)
    • 25. Channel Islands (36)
    • 26. Mount St. Mary’s (7)
  • Rankings for this period include all-league play up to 2/12/16, the MLK Tournament at San Jose St, and preseason results.
  • Big matches this weekend at UCSB in So-Cal, and all Nor-Cal teams play at St. Mary’s College in Moraga.
  • A point system is used in reverse order of ranking.  That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on.  Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.

Nor-Cal Results Up to 2/9/16

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • D1 South
    • #2 Cal Poly d. #11 Santa Clara 3-0
    • #2 Cal Poly d. #10 San Jose St 3-0
    • #6 Stanford d. #8 Cal 3-1
    • #8 Cal d. #10 San Jose St 3-0
    • Upsets:
      • #11 Santa Clara d. #2 Cal Poly 3-1
      • #11 Santa Clara d. #6 Stanford 3-1
      • #11 Santa Clara d. #10 San Jose St 3-0
  • D1 North
    • #1 Davis d. #7 Sonoma 3-0
    • Upset: #20 Chico St d. #7 Sonoma 3-2
    • Note: Nevada-Reno has been snowed out
  • D2 North
    • #1 Davis II d. #3 Sacramento St 3-1
    • #1 Davis II d. #9 Sonoma II 3-0
    • #3 Sacramento St. d. #23 Pacific 3-1
    • #8 St. Mary’s d. #23 Pacific 3-0
    • #9 Sonoma II d. #23 Pacific 3-1
    • Nevada-Reno II d. #23 Pacific 3-1
    • Upset: #9 Sonoma II d. #8 St. Mary’s 3-1
  • D2 South
    • #2 Cal Poly II d. #5 Fresno St 3-0
    • #4 USF d. #11 SJSU II 3-0
    • #4 USF d. #19 SFSU 3-2
    • Upset: #19 SFSU d. #11 SJSU II 3-0

© California Collegiate Volleyball Conference, Inc.

Disclaimer: All information provided on the California Collegiate Volleyball Conference’s (CCVC) web site is provided for information purposes only. Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate information, CCVC makes no guarantees of any kind and cannot be held liable for any outdated or incorrect information. CCVC’s web site may contain information created and maintained by a variety of external sources, organizations, associations, or information providers. CCVC does not control, monitor or guarantee the accuracy of the information contained from these external sites and sources, and does not necessarily endorse any views expressed or products or services that may be offered therein. In no event should CCVC be responsible or liable directly or indirectly for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such information available on or through any such site or resource. Any information to external web sites linked to CCVC’s web site or other entities not associated with CCVC are provided as a courtesy. They should not be construed as an endorsement by CCVC of the content or views of the linked materials. All rights reserved. Contents on CCVC’s web site may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission of CCVC.

Powered by Warp Theme Framework