2016 Rankings

  • Women’s D1 Rankings – April 1, 2016 – Final State Rankings
    • 1. UC Davis (126 points)
    • 2. Cal Poly (120)
    • 3. UCSD (112)
    • 4. UCLA (107)
    • 5. UCSB (99)
    • 6. Sonoma St (92)
    • 7. Santa Clara (87)
    • 8. Arizona (80)
    • 9. Stanford (74)
    • 10. San Diego St (73)
    • T11. LMU (64)
    • T11. U. San Diego (64)
    • 13. Long Beach (63)
    • 14. USC (52)
    • 15. UC Berkeley (42)
    • 16. Chico St (33)
    • 17. UC Irvine (27)
    • 18. Nevada-Reno (23)
    • 19. Fullerton (20)
    • 20. San Jose St (15)
    • 21. Arizona St (13)
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – April 1, 2016 – Final* State Rankings (*may change after NCCVL-W championships)
    • T1 USF (152 points)
    • T1 Cal Poly II (152)
    • 3. UC Davis II (143)
    • 4. UCSB II (137)
    • 5. Point Loma (134)
    • 6. UCLA II (120)
    • 7. USC II (107)
    • 8. Sacramento St (106)
    • 9. Azusa Pacific (105)
    • 10. Claremont (103)
    • 11. Cal Poly Pomona (95)
    • 12. Fresno St (87)
    • T13 San Francisco St (86)
    • T13 Riverside (86)
    • 15. San Diego St II (71)
    • 16. St. Mary’s (67)
    • T17 Sonoma St II (66)
    • T17 Northridge (66)
    • 19. Channel Islands (40)
    • 20. Nevada-Reno II (39)
    • 21. UC Irvine II (38)
    • 22. San Marcos (35)
    • 23. Fullerton II (30)
    • 24. Pacific (20)
    • 25. San Jose St II (15)
    • 26. Mount St. Mary’s (6)
  • Women’s D1 Rankings – March 11, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly (125 pts)
    • 2. UC Davis (121)
    • 3. UCLA (114)
    • 4. UCSD (106)
    • 5. UCSB (95)
    • 6. Sonoma St (89)
    • 7. Santa Clara (88)
    • 8. Arizona (87)
    • 9. Stanford (79)
    • 10. San Diego St (71)
    • 11. Long Beach (62)
    • 12. LMU (58)
    • 13. USC (56)
    • 14. Cal (56)
    • 15. Chico St (51)
    • 16. San Jose St (28)
    • 17. Arizona St (26)
    • 18. San Diego (25)
    • 19. Fullerton (21)
    • 20. UC Irvine (18)
    • 21. Nevada-Reno (10)
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – March 11, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly II (153 pts)
    • 2. USF (152)
    • 3. UC Davis II (145)
    • 4. UCSB II (138)
    • 5. Point Loma (117)
    • 6. Azusa Pacific (116)
    • 7. UCLA II (112)
    • 8. San Francisco St (109)
    • 9. Sacramento St (106)
    • 10. USC II (93)
    • T11. Fresno St (86)
    • T11. Claremont (86)
    • T13. Riverside (85)
    • T13. San Diego St II (85)
    • 15. Pomona (78)
    • 16. Sonoma St II (75)
    • 17. St. Mary’s (72)
    • 18. Northridge (49)
    • 19. Nevada-Reno II (47)
    • T20. UC Irvine II (38)
    • T20. San Marcos 38
    • 22. Channel Islands (34)
    • 23. Fullerton II (33)
    • 24. San Jose St II (27)
    • 25. Pacific (18)
    • 26. Mount St. Mary’s (14)
  • Women’s D1 Rankings – February 27, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly (125 pts)
    • 2. Davis (121)
    • 3. UCLA (112)
    • 4. Sonoma St (101)
    • 5. UCSB (97)
    • 6. UCSD (94)
    • 7. Stanford (90)
    • 8. Arizona (88)
    • 9. Santa Clara (78)
    • 10. San Diego St (74)
    • 11. USC (72)
    • 12. Chico St (61)
    • 13. Cal (50)
    • 14. LMU (43)
    • T15. Long Beach (37)
    • T15. Arizona St (37)
    • 17. San Jose St (34)
    • 18. Fullerton (23)
    • 19. San Diego (22)
    • 20. Irvine (14)
    • 21. Nevada-Reno (13)
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – February 27, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly II 151 (pts)
    • 2. USF (150)
    • 3. Davis II (149)
    • 4. UCSB II (119)
    • 5. San Francisco St (116)
    • 6. Point Loma (113)
    • 7. Azusa Pacific (112)
    • 8. St. Mary’s (106)
    • 9. Sacramento St (103)
    • 10. UCLA II (96)
    • 11. Fresno St (94)
    • 12. Claremont (93)
    • T13. San Diego St II (84)
    • T13. Sonoma St II (84)
    • 15. USC II (76)
    • 16. Cal Poly Pomona (75)
    • 17. Riverside (70)
    • 18. Nevada-Reno II (69)
    • 19. San Marcos (47)
    • 20. Fullerton II (37)
    • 21. Northridge (36)
    • 22. Irvine II (34)
    • 23. San Jose St II (33)
    • 24. Channel Islands (28)
    • 25. Pacific (19)
    • 26. Mount St. Mary’s (7)
 
  • Women’s D1 Rankings – February 12, 2016
    • 1. Davis (125)
    • 2. UCLA (114)
    • 3. Cal Poly (111)
    • 4. UCSB (108)
    • 5. Arizona (100)
    • 6. Santa Clara (96)
    • 7. Stanford (83)
    • 8. UCSD (79)
    • 9. Cal (69)
    • 10. Chico St (68)
    • 11. Sonoma St (67)
    • 12. San Diego St (62)
    • T13. San Jose St (43)
    • T13. Arizona St (43)
    • T13. Long Beach (43)
    • 16. USC (42)
    • 17. LMU (40)
    • 18. Fullerton (32)
    • 19. Irvine (29)
    • 20. Nevada-Reno (17)
    • 21. San Diego (15)
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – February 12, 2016
    • 1. Davis II (159 pts)
    • 2. Cal Poly II (152)
    • 3. USF (146)
    • 4. Sacramento St (140)
    • 5. UCSB II (135)
    • 6. Fresno St (123)
    • 7. UCLA II (118)
    • 8. Azusa Pacific (115)
    • 9. Sonoma St II (108)
    • 10. St. Mary’s (103)
    • 11. San Francisco St (93)
    • 12. San Diego St II (90)
    • 13. Claremont (88)
    • 14. Point Loma (81)
    • 15. Irvine II (68)
    • T16. San Jose St II (65)
    • T16. Riverside (65)
    • 18. Nevada-Reno II (63)
    • 19. San Marcos (61)
    • 20. USC II (57)
    • 21. Pomona (52)
    • 22. Fullerton II (46)
    • T23. Northridge (39)
    • T23. Pacific (39)
    • 25. Channel Islands (36)
    • 26. Mount St. Mary’s (7)
  • Women’s D1 Rankings – January 30, 2016
    • 1. Davis (126 pts)
    • 2. Cal Poly (120)
    • T3. Arizona (109)
    • T3. UCLA (109)
    • 5. UCSB (106)
    • 6. Stanford (94)
    • 7. Sonoma St. (83)
    • T8. Cal (74)
    • T8. Irvine (74)
    • 10. San Jose St (70)
    • 11. Santa Clara (68)
    • 12. Arizona St (64)
    • 13. San Diego St (57)
    • 14. UCSD (55)
    • 15. USC (41)
    • 16. LMU (32)
    • 17. Nevada-Reno (30)
    • 18. Long Beach (25)
    • 19. Fullerton (22)
    • 20. Chico St (18)
    • 21. San Diego (22)
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – January 30, 2016
    • 1. Davis II (133 pts)
    • 2. Cal Poly II (126)
    • 3. Sacramento St (120)
    • 4. USF (117)
    • 5. Fresno St (113)
    • 6. UCLA II (110)
    • 7. UCSB II (103)
    • 8. St. Mary’s (102)
    • 9. Sonoma St II (95)
    • 10. Irvine II (87)
    • 11. San Jose St II (75)
    • 12. Azusa Pacific (74)
    • 13. USC II (69)
    • 14. Nevada-Reno II (67)
    • 15. San Diego St II (65)
    • T16. Point Loma (60)
    • T16. San Marcos (60)
    • 18. Riverside (50)
    • 19. San Francisco St (48)
    • 20. Fullerton II (45)
    • 21. Pomona (44)
    • 22. Northridge (35)
    • 23. Pacific (32)
    • 24. Channel Islands (20)
    • 25. Claremont (19)
    • 26. San Bernardino (14)
    • 27. Mount St. Mary’s (7)
  • Women’s D1 Preseason Rankings – January 7, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly (141 pts)
    • 2. Davis (140)
    • 3. Arizona (136)
    • 4. UCSB (104)
    • 5. USC (103)
    • 6. Cal (100)
    • 7. UCLA (98)
    • 8. San Diego St (97)
    • 9. UCSD (82)
    • 10. ASU (75)
    • 11. Stanford (72)
    • 12. Irvine (63)
    • 13. Sonoma St (54)
    • 14. Santa Clara (50)
    • 15. San Jose St (50)
    • 16. Nevada-Reno (47)
    • 17. Fullerton (44)
    • 18. LMU (36)
    • 19. Long Beach (32)
    • 20. Chico St (24)
    • 21. San Diego (22)
  • Women’s D2 Preseason Rankings – January 7, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly II (185)
    • 2. USF (171)
    • 3. Davis II (167)
    • 4. UCSB II (160)
    • 5. USC II (158)
    • 6. Sac. St (135)
    • 7. St. Mary’s (132)
    • 8. Nevada-Reno II (129)
    • 9. San Marcos (121)
    • 10. Sonoma St II (115)
    • 11. San Diego St II (113)
    • 12. UCLA II (107)
    • 13. Point Loma (100)
    • 14. Azusa Pacific (94)
    • 15. Pomona (80)
    • 16. Irvine II (80)
    • 17. Fresno St (74)
    • 18. Fullerton II (74)
    • 19. SF State (66)
    • 20. Northridge (64)
    • 21. Pacific (63)
    • 22. San Jose St II (62)
    • 23. Claremont (57)
    • 24. Channel Islands (55)
    • 25. Riverside (41)
    • 26. Mount St Mary’s (27)
    • 27. San Bernardino (16)

© California Collegiate Volleyball Conference, Inc.

Disclaimer: All information provided on the California Collegiate Volleyball Conference’s (CCVC) web site is provided for information purposes only. Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate information, CCVC makes no guarantees of any kind and cannot be held liable for any outdated or incorrect information. CCVC’s web site may contain information created and maintained by a variety of external sources, organizations, associations, or information providers. CCVC does not control, monitor or guarantee the accuracy of the information contained from these external sites and sources, and does not necessarily endorse any views expressed or products or services that may be offered therein. In no event should CCVC be responsible or liable directly or indirectly for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such information available on or through any such site or resource. Any information to external web sites linked to CCVC’s web site or other entities not associated with CCVC are provided as a courtesy. They should not be construed as an endorsement by CCVC of the content or views of the linked materials. All rights reserved. Contents on CCVC’s web site may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission of CCVC.

Powered by Warp Theme Framework