Women’s D1 & D2 January 30, 2016 Rankings

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • Women’s D1 Rankings – January 30, 2016
    • 1. Davis (126 pts)
    • 2. Cal Poly (120)
    • T3. Arizona (109)
    • T3. UCLA (109)
    • 5. UCSB (106)
    • 6. Stanford (94)
    • 7. Sonoma St. (83)
    • T8. Cal (74)
    • T8. Irvine (74)
    • 10. San Jose St (70)
    • 11. Santa Clara (68)
    • 12. Arizona St (64)
    • 13. San Diego St (57)
    • 14. UCSD (55)
    • 15. USC (41)
    • 16. LMU (32)
    • 17. Nevada-Reno (30)
    • 18. Long Beach (25)
    • 19. Fullerton (22)
    • 20. Chico St (18)
    • 21. San Diego (9)
 
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – January 30, 2016
    • 1. Davis II (133 pts)
    • 2. Cal Poly II (126)
    • 3. Sacramento St (120)
    • 4. USF (117)
    • 5. Fresno St (113)
    • 6. UCLA II (110)
    • 7. UCSB II (103)
    • 8. St. Mary’s (102)
    • 9. Sonoma St II (95)
    • 10. Irvine II (87)
    • 11. San Jose St II (75)
    • 12. Azusa Pacific (74)
    • 13. USC II (69)
    • 14. Nevada-Reno II (67)
    • 15. San Diego St II (65)
    • T16. Point Loma (60)
    • T16. San Marcos (60)
    • 18. Riverside (50)
    • 19. San Francisco St (48)
    • 20. Fullerton II (45)
    • 21. Pomona (44)
    • 22. Northridge (35)
    • 23. Pacific (32)
    • 24. Channel Islands (20)
    • 25. Claremont (19)
    • 26. San Bernardino (14)
    • 27. Mount St. Mary’s (7)
 
  • Rankings for this period include the MLK Tournament at San Jose St and preseason results.  We expect a big shake-up after So-Cal and Nor-Cal matches this weekend.
  • A point system is used in reverse order of ranking.  That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on.  Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.

Tags:

© California Collegiate Volleyball Conference, Inc.

Disclaimer: All information provided on the California Collegiate Volleyball Conference’s (CCVC) web site is provided for information purposes only. Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate information, CCVC makes no guarantees of any kind and cannot be held liable for any outdated or incorrect information. CCVC’s web site may contain information created and maintained by a variety of external sources, organizations, associations, or information providers. CCVC does not control, monitor or guarantee the accuracy of the information contained from these external sites and sources, and does not necessarily endorse any views expressed or products or services that may be offered therein. In no event should CCVC be responsible or liable directly or indirectly for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such information available on or through any such site or resource. Any information to external web sites linked to CCVC’s web site or other entities not associated with CCVC are provided as a courtesy. They should not be construed as an endorsement by CCVC of the content or views of the linked materials. All rights reserved. Contents on CCVC’s web site may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission of CCVC.

Powered by Warp Theme Framework