Author Archive

Nor-Cal Results Up to 2/9/16

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • D1 South
    • #2 Cal Poly d. #11 Santa Clara 3-0
    • #2 Cal Poly d. #10 San Jose St 3-0
    • #6 Stanford d. #8 Cal 3-1
    • #8 Cal d. #10 San Jose St 3-0
    • Upsets:
      • #11 Santa Clara d. #2 Cal Poly 3-1
      • #11 Santa Clara d. #6 Stanford 3-1
      • #11 Santa Clara d. #10 San Jose St 3-0
  • D1 North
    • #1 Davis d. #7 Sonoma 3-0
    • Upset: #20 Chico St d. #7 Sonoma 3-2
    • Note: Nevada-Reno has been snowed out
  • D2 North
    • #1 Davis II d. #3 Sacramento St 3-1
    • #1 Davis II d. #9 Sonoma II 3-0
    • #3 Sacramento St. d. #23 Pacific 3-1
    • #8 St. Mary’s d. #23 Pacific 3-0
    • #9 Sonoma II d. #23 Pacific 3-1
    • Nevada-Reno II d. #23 Pacific 3-1
    • Upset: #9 Sonoma II d. #8 St. Mary’s 3-1
  • D2 South
    • #2 Cal Poly II d. #5 Fresno St 3-0
    • #4 USF d. #11 SJSU II 3-0
    • #4 USF d. #19 SFSU 3-2
    • Upset: #19 SFSU d. #11 SJSU II 3-0

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

January 30, 2016 Women’s D1 North v. D1 East Results at UCLA
  • D1 North (#3 UCLA, #5 UCSB, #15 USC, #16 LMU) crossed over with D1 East (#8 Irvine, #12 Arizona St, #18 Long Beach, #19 Fullerton).  Rankings are based on the California poll from January 30, 2016.
  • The North dominated with both #3 UCLA and #5 UCSB going 4-0, and #16 LMU finishing 3-1.  #15 USC went 2-2.  In the East, #8 Irvine, #18 Long Beach, and #19 Fullerton all finished 1-3.  The far traveling #12 Arizona St. went 0-4.
  • Match results
    • #3 UCLA d. #8 Irvine 26-24, 25-18
    • #3 UCLA d. #12 Arizona St 25-11, 25-21
    • #3 UCLA d. #18 Long Beach 25-20, 25-16
    • #3 UCLA d. #19 Fullerton 28-26, 30-28
    • #5 UCSB d. #8 Irvine 30-28, 23-25, 15-9
    • #5 UCSB d. #12 Arizona St 25-22, 25-27, 15-12
    • #5 UCSB d. #18 Long Beach 16-25, 25-20, 15-4
    • #5 UCSB d. #19 Fullerton 25-18, 25-14
    • #8 Irvine d. #16 LMU 27-25, 20-25, 15-13
    • #16 LMU d. #19 Fullerton 25-10, 26-24
    • #16 LMU d. #18 Long Beach 26-24, 25-23
    • Featured Upsets
      • #15 USC d. #8 Irvine 25-14, 25-17
      • #15 USC d. #12 Arizona St 25-14, 25-17
      • #16 LMU d. #12 Arizona St 25-20, 25-19
      • #18 Long Beach d. #15 USC 24-26, 26-24, 15-12
      • #19 Fullerton d. #15 USC 25-23, 19-25, 17-15

Scholarship Fundraiser – Order Due by February 7

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in Uncategorized

We have received numerous requests as to whether we are going to sell our California long-sleeve t-shirts.  Due to the requests, we are making a special order of shirts.  Please pass on the design to your teams/players.
  • All shirt proceeds will be used to fund scholarships for California club volleyball players.  We have awarded more than $6,500 over the last couple years in scholarship funds to eligible players.
    • Scholarship applications for this season will be posted at a later date.
  • Cost is $16/shirt.
  • Send us your order (to ccvc@ccvcvolleyball.org) with sizes by Feb. 7.  We will work with each team for payment and shipping/delivery.
  Scholarship Shirt

Women’s D1 & D2 January 30, 2016 Rankings

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • Women’s D1 Rankings – January 30, 2016
    • 1. Davis (126 pts)
    • 2. Cal Poly (120)
    • T3. Arizona (109)
    • T3. UCLA (109)
    • 5. UCSB (106)
    • 6. Stanford (94)
    • 7. Sonoma St. (83)
    • T8. Cal (74)
    • T8. Irvine (74)
    • 10. San Jose St (70)
    • 11. Santa Clara (68)
    • 12. Arizona St (64)
    • 13. San Diego St (57)
    • 14. UCSD (55)
    • 15. USC (41)
    • 16. LMU (32)
    • 17. Nevada-Reno (30)
    • 18. Long Beach (25)
    • 19. Fullerton (22)
    • 20. Chico St (18)
    • 21. San Diego (9)
 
  • Women’s D2 Rankings – January 30, 2016
    • 1. Davis II (133 pts)
    • 2. Cal Poly II (126)
    • 3. Sacramento St (120)
    • 4. USF (117)
    • 5. Fresno St (113)
    • 6. UCLA II (110)
    • 7. UCSB II (103)
    • 8. St. Mary’s (102)
    • 9. Sonoma St II (95)
    • 10. Irvine II (87)
    • 11. San Jose St II (75)
    • 12. Azusa Pacific (74)
    • 13. USC II (69)
    • 14. Nevada-Reno II (67)
    • 15. San Diego St II (65)
    • T16. Point Loma (60)
    • T16. San Marcos (60)
    • 18. Riverside (50)
    • 19. San Francisco St (48)
    • 20. Fullerton II (45)
    • 21. Pomona (44)
    • 22. Northridge (35)
    • 23. Pacific (32)
    • 24. Channel Islands (20)
    • 25. Claremont (19)
    • 26. San Bernardino (14)
    • 27. Mount St. Mary’s (7)
 
  • Rankings for this period include the MLK Tournament at San Jose St and preseason results.  We expect a big shake-up after So-Cal and Nor-Cal matches this weekend.
  • A point system is used in reverse order of ranking.  That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on.  Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.

Women’s D1 and D2 Preseason Rankings

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • Women’s D1 Preseason Rankings – January 7, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly (141 pts)
    • 2. Davis (140)
    • 3. Arizona (136)
    • 4. UCSB (104)
    • 5. USC (103)
    • 6. Cal (100)
    • 7. UCLA (98)
    • 8. San Diego St (97)
    • 9. UCSD (82)
    • 10. ASU (75)
    • 11. Stanford (72)
    • 12. Irvine (63)
    • 13. Sonoma St (54)
    • 14. Santa Clara (50)
    • 15. San Jose St (50)
    • 16. Nevada-Reno (47)
    • 17. Fullerton (44)
    • 18. LMU (36)
    • 19. Long Beach (32)
    • 20. Chico St (24)
    • 21. San Diego (22)
  • Women’s D2 Preseason Rankings – January 7, 2016
    • 1. Cal Poly II (185)
    • 2. USF (171)
    • 3. Davis II (167)
    • 4. UCSB II (160)
    • 5. USC II (158)
    • 6. Sac. St (135)
    • 7. St. Mary’s (132)
    • 8. Nevada-Reno II (129)
    • 9. San Marcos (121)
    • 10. Sonoma St II (115)
    • 11. San Diego St II (113)
    • 12. UCLA II (107)
    • 13. Point Loma (100)
    • 14. Azusa Pacific (94)
    • 15. Pomona (80)
    • 16. Irvine II (80)
    • 17. Fresno St (74)
    • 18. Fullerton II (74)
    • 19. SF State (66)
    • 20. Northridge (64)
    • 21. Pacific (63)
    • 22. San Jose St II (62)
    • 23. Claremont (57)
    • 24. Channel Islands (55)
    • 25. Riverside (41)
    • 26. Mount St Mary’s (27)
    • 27. San Bernardino (16)
  • Rankings are determined by the 7 members of the CCVC Ranking Panel.  The names of the panel members are under the Ranking tab.  Each member ranks teams from top to bottom.  A point system is used in reverse order of ranking.  That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on.  Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.  No set criteria is used for ranking teams, although panel members use a combination of objective and subjective criteria.  Each panel member uses results (objective) from the season to assist with their determination (subjective).  There are no restrictions on how to vote.

© California Collegiate Volleyball Conference, Inc.

Disclaimer: All information provided on the California Collegiate Volleyball Conference’s (CCVC) web site is provided for information purposes only. Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate information, CCVC makes no guarantees of any kind and cannot be held liable for any outdated or incorrect information. CCVC’s web site may contain information created and maintained by a variety of external sources, organizations, associations, or information providers. CCVC does not control, monitor or guarantee the accuracy of the information contained from these external sites and sources, and does not necessarily endorse any views expressed or products or services that may be offered therein. In no event should CCVC be responsible or liable directly or indirectly for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such information available on or through any such site or resource. Any information to external web sites linked to CCVC’s web site or other entities not associated with CCVC are provided as a courtesy. They should not be construed as an endorsement by CCVC of the content or views of the linked materials. All rights reserved. Contents on CCVC’s web site may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission of CCVC.

Powered by Warp Theme Framework