Women’s 2/4/15 Rankings

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

Rankings are determined by the CCVC Ranking Panel (5 Division 1 members and 4 Division 2 members).  Each member ranks teams from top to bottom.  A point system is used in reverse order of ranking: if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on.  Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.  No set criteria is used for ranking teams, although panel members use a combination of objective and subjective criteria.  Each panel member uses results (objective) from the season to assist with their determination (subjective).  There are no restrictions on how to vote.  The next ranking date is mid-February 2015.
  • Women’s D1 Rankings – February 4, 2015
    • 1. UCSB (95 pts)
    • 2. SDSU (90)
    • 3. UC Davis (82)
    • 4. Cal Poly (81)
    • 5. UCLA (77)
    • 6. Stanford (66)
    • 7. UCSD (63)
    • 8. USC (56)
    • 9. Santa Clara (52)
    • 10. UC Berkeley (45)
    • 11. UC Irvine (45)
    • 12. Long Beach (44)
    • 13. LMU (35)
    • 14. Chico St. (28)
    • 15. Fullerton (26)
    • 16. SJSU (22)
    • 17. Nevada-Reno (18)
    • 18. U. San Diego (15)
    • 19. Sonoma St. (10).
  •  Women’s D2 Rankings – February 4, 2015
    • 1. Cal Poly II (91 pts)
    • 2. Azusa Pacific (81)
    • 3. USC II (74)
    • 4. Sac. St. (70)
    • 5. UC Davis II (70)
    • 6. Point Loma (69)
    • 7. St. Mary’s (68)
    • 8. Riverside (63)
    • 9. UCSB II (60)
    • 10. San Marcos (57)
    • 11. U. San Francisco (54)
    • 12. Fresno St. (49)
    • 13. Claremont (45)
    • 14. UC Irvine II (39)
    • 15. SFSU (37)
    • 16. SDSU II (36)
    • 17. Pacific (33)
    • 18. Fullerton II (32)
    • 19. SJSU II (25)
    • 20. Nevada-Reno II (20)
    • 21. Channel Islands (19)
    • 22. San Bernardino (19)
    • 23. Northridge (4)

Men’s Results as of 2/1/15

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

  • North League Best 3 of 5
    • UC Davis d. Chico St. 25-17, 25-8, 25-16
    • UC Davis d. Sac St. 25-11, 25-16, 25-18
    • UC Davis d. Sonoma St. 25-22, 25-27, 21-25, 25-15
    • Santa Clara d. Stanford 25-16, 25-19, 25-23
    • Sac St. d. Chico St. 25-22, 21-25, 25-18, 25-22
    • UC Berkeley d. Sonoma St. 25-23, 25-21, 25-20
    • Cal Poly d. Fresno 25-13, 25-27, 25-28, 25-21
    • Chico St. d. UC Berkeley 25-23, 25-16, 25-19
  • South Regional at UCLA
    • Long Beach d. USC 25-16, 17-25, 15-12
    • UCLA d. UCSB 25-18, 15-25, 15-11
    • UCLA d. Arizona St. 25-23, 25-27, 17-15
    • UCLA d. Long Beach 25-19, 25-20
    • UCLA d. USC 26-24, 24-26, 15-13
    • Arizona St. d. Long Beach 25-19, 25-19
    • Arizona St. d. USC 25-23, 25-18
    • Arizona St. d. UCSB 20-25, 27-25, 15-11
    • UCSB d. USC 25-15, 25-23
    • UCSB d. Long Beach 26-24, 29-31, 15-12
  • South Regional at Fullerton
    • Arizona d. SDSU 25-14, 25-19
    • Arizona d. UC Irvine 25-14, 25-19
    • Arizona d. UCSD 25-22, 21-25, 15-11
    • Arizona d. Fullerton 29-27, 25-17
    • UCSD d. SDSU 25-22, 23-25, 15-10
    • UCSD d. Fullerton 18-25, 25-23, 15-11
    • UC Irvine d. UCSD 28-26, 25-22
    • UC Irvine d. SDSU 25-19, 25-13
    • Fullerton d. UC Irvine 32-30, 25-23
    • Fullerton d. SDSU 26-24, 25-21

Women’s January Ranking

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

Rankings are determined by the CCVC Ranking Panel (5 Division 1 members and 4 Division 2 members).  Each member ranks teams from top to bottom.  A point system is used in reverse order of ranking: if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on.  Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.  No set criteria is used for ranking teams, although panel members use a combination of objective and subjective criteria.  Each panel member uses results (objective) from the season to assist with their determination (subjective).  There are no restrictions on how to vote.  The next ranking date is the beginning of February 2015.
  • Women’s D1 Rankings – January 22, 2015
    • 1. UCSB (76 pts)
    • 2. SDSU (67)
    • 3. UC Davis (66)
    • 4. Cal Poly (66)
    • 5. UCLA (63)
    • 6. Stanford (56)
    • 7. USC (51)
    • 8. Santa Clara (44)
    • 9. UCSD (39)
    • 10. UC Berkeley (38)
    • 11. Long Beach (33)
    • 12. SJSU (30)
    • 13. Chico St. (30)
    • 14. UC Irvine (30)
    • 15. Fullerton (19)
    • 16. LMU (14)
    • 17. Sonoma St. (13)
    • 18. Nevada-Reno (13)
    • 19. USD (12)
  •  Women’s D2 Rankings – January 22, 2015
    •  1. Cal Poly II (62 pts)
    • 2. USC II (58)
    • 3. UCSB II (54)
    • 4. UC Davis (54)
    • 5. Azusa Pacific (46)
    • 6. UC Irvine II (39)
    • 7. San Marcos (37)
    • 8. SJSU II (33)
    • 9. St. Mary’s (32)
    • 10. Channel Islands (31)
    • 11. Fresno St. (29)
    • 12. Nevada-Reno II (25)
    • 13. SFSU (23)
    • 14. Fulleron II (22)
    • 15. SDSU II (29)
    • 16. UC Riverside (19)
    • 17. USF (18)
    • 18. Pacific (17)
    • 19. Sac. St. (16)
    • 20. Point Loma (15)
    • 21. Claremont (11)

Women’s MLK Tourney at UCSB

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

The women’s MLK tourney is taking place January 17-18, 2015, at UCSB.  Saturday’s pool play starts at 9:30am.   Sunday’s play features power pools followed by bracket play.  The pools for the weekend are:
  • Pool A – Davis, USC, Arizona St., SJSU II
  • Pool B – Santa Clara, San Marcos, N. Arizona, USC II
  • Pool C – UCLA, Chico St., Fresno St., Irvine II
  • Pool D – UCSB, Oregon, SJSU, Davis II
  • Pool E – Stanford, Irvine, Utah Valley, Cal Poly II
  • Pool F – Cal Poly, SDSU, Oregon II, UCSB II

© California Collegiate Volleyball Conference, Inc.

Disclaimer: All information provided on the California Collegiate Volleyball Conference’s (CCVC) web site is provided for information purposes only. Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate information, CCVC makes no guarantees of any kind and cannot be held liable for any outdated or incorrect information. CCVC’s web site may contain information created and maintained by a variety of external sources, organizations, associations, or information providers. CCVC does not control, monitor or guarantee the accuracy of the information contained from these external sites and sources, and does not necessarily endorse any views expressed or products or services that may be offered therein. In no event should CCVC be responsible or liable directly or indirectly for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such information available on or through any such site or resource. Any information to external web sites linked to CCVC’s web site or other entities not associated with CCVC are provided as a courtesy. They should not be construed as an endorsement by CCVC of the content or views of the linked materials. All rights reserved. Contents on CCVC’s web site may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission of CCVC.

Powered by Warp Theme Framework