2017 Rankings

Women’s D1 Rankings – March 28, 2017
  • 1. San Diego St. (80 pts.)
  • 2. USF (76)
  • 3. USC (70)
  • T4. Davis (66)
  • T4. UCSD (66)
  • 6. UCLA (57)
  • 7. Chico St. (51)
  • 8. Santa Clara (50)
  • 9. Cal (47)
  • 10. Cal Poly (46)
  • 11. Stanford (41)
  • T12. UCSB (33)
  • T12. San Diego
  • 14. Sonoma St. (27)
  • 15. Fullerton (26)
  • 16. LMU (21)
  • T17. Sac. St. (19)
  • T17. Long Beach (19)
  • 19. Nevada-Reno (7)
  • 20. Irvine (5)
Women’s D2 Rankings – February 24, 2017
  • 1. San Jose St. (95 pts.)
  • 2. Point Loma (90)
  • 3. UCLA II (86)
  • 4. San Diego St. II (85)
  • 5. Cal Poly II (82)
  • 6. Sonoma St. II (75)
  • 7. USC II (74)
  • 8. Northridge (66)
  • 9. Azusa Pacific (65)
  • 10. St. Mary’s (60)
  • 11. San Francisco St. (58)
  • 12. Riverside (52)
  • 13. Cal Poly Pomona (48)
  • 14. San Bernardino (44)
  • 15. Claremont (40)
  • 16. William Jessup (36)
  • 17. San Marcos (32)
  • 18. Fullerton II (28)
  • 19. Davis II (24)
  • 20. UCSB II (20)
  • 21. Channel Islands (16)
  • 22. Mount St. Mary’s (12)
  • 23. Pacific (8)
  • 24. Irvine II (4)
Women’s D1 Rankings – February 24, 2017
  • 1. USF (79 pts.)
  • 2. USC (73)
  • 3. UCSD (72)
  • 4. San Diego St. (70)
  • 5. Stanford (58)
  • 6. Davis (58)
  • 7. San Diego (53)
  • 8. Long Beach (50)
  • 9. Santa Clara (48)
  • 10. Cal Poly (45)
  • T11. UCLA (40)
  • T11. UCSB (40)
  • 13. LMU (37)
  • 14. Cal (27)
  • 15. Chico St. (25)
  • 16. Sonoma St. (24)
  • 17. Sac St. (14)
  • 18. Nevada-Reno (11)
  • 19. Fullerton (10)
  • 20. Irvine (6)
Women’s D2 Rankings – February 24, 2017
  • 1. UCLA II (96 pts.)
  • 2. San Jose St. (88)
  • 3. San Diego St. II (86)
  • 4. Cal Poly II (82)
  • 5. William Jessup (77)
  • 6. USC II (74)
  • 7. Sonoma St. II (72)
  • T8. Northridge (62)
  • T8. Point Loma (62)
  • 10. SFSU (58)
  • 11. San Bernardino (55)
  • 12. St. Mary’s (52)
  • 13. Claremont (48)
  • 14. Davis II (46)
  • 15. UCSB II (40)
  • 16. San Marcos (38)
  • 17. Riverside (37)
  • 18. Azusa Pacific (36)
  • 19. Fullerton II (26)
  • 20. Channel Islands (22)
  • 21. Cal Poly Pomona (18)
  • 22. Pacific (11)
  • 23. Irvine II (10)
  • 24. Mount St. Mary’s (4)
Women’s D1 Rankings – February 9, 2017
  • 1. UCSD (78 pts.)
  • 2. USF (76)
  • 3. Davis (68)
  • 4. USC (67)
  • 5. UCLA (66)
  • 6. Sonoma St. (60)
  • 7. Santa Clara (52)
  • 8. San Diego St. (50)
  • 9. Stanford (48)
  • 10. Long Beach (46)
  • 11. UCSB (42)
  • 12. LMU (35)
  • T13. Cal Poly (31)
  • T13. Chico St. (31)
  • 15. Cal (24)
  • 16. San Diego (20)
  • 17. Sac. St. (18)
  • T18. Nevada-Reno (10)
  • T18. Irvine (10)
  • 20. Fullerton (8)
Women’s D2 Rankings – February 9, 2017
  • 1. UCLA II (95 pts.)
  • 2. San Jose St. (92)
  • 3. Cal Poly II (87)
  • 4. Sonoma St. II (79)
  • T5. USC II (78)
  • T5. San Diego St. II (78)
  • 7. UCSB II (68)
  • T8. William Jessup (59)
  • T8. Riverside (59)
  • 10. Davis II (54)
  • 11. St. Mary’s (52)
  • 12. Fullerton II (51)
  • T13. San Marcos (50)
  • T13. Cal Poly Pomona (50)
  • T15. Azusa Pacific (46)
  • T15. Point Loma (46)
  • 17. Pacific (32)
  • 18. SFSU (31)
  • 19. Northridge (30)
  • 20. Irvine II (23)
  • 21. Claremont (16)
  • 22. San Bernardino (12)
  • 23. Channel Islands (8)
  • 24. Mount St. Mary’s (4)
Women’s D1 Rankings – January 23, 2017
  • 1. UCSB (80 pts.)
  • 2. USF (73)
  • 3. Sonoma St. (72)
  • 4. UCLA (71)
  • T5. Davis (61)
  • T5. Santa Clara (61)
  • 7. USC (58)
  • 8. San Diego St. (49)
  • 9. Stanford (45)
  • 10. UCSD (43)
  • 11. Cal Poly (40)
  • 12. Chico St. (43)
  • 13. Cal (32)
  • 14. San Diego (31)
  • T15. Sac St. (23)
  • T15. LMU (23)
  • T17. Irvine (14)
  • T17. Fullerton (14)
  • 19. Long Beach (12)
  • 20. Nevada-Reno (5)
  Women’s D2 Rankings – January 23, 2017
  • 1. San Jose St. (98 pts.)
  • 2. UCLA II (94)
  • 3. Cal Poly II (90)
  • 4. UCSB II (86)
  • 5. Sonoma St. II (81)
  • 6. San Diego St. II (79)
  • 7. USC II (74)
  • 8. Davis II (61)
  • T9. Azusa Pacific (56)
  • T9. Point Loma (56)
  • 11. San Marcos (49)
  • T12. Fullerton II (49)
  • T12. Cal Poly Pomona (49)
  • 14. Riverside (45)
  • 15. SFSU (44)
  • 16. St. Mary’s (43)
  • 17. William Jessup (39)
  • 18. Northridge (37)
  • 19. Pacific (31)
  • 20. Irvine II (30)
  • 21. Claremont (23)
  • 22. San Bernardino (15)
  • 23. Channel Islands (12)
  • 24. Mount St. Mary’s (7)
  Women’s D1 Preseason Rankings – January 9, 2017
  • 1. UCSB (100 pts)
  • 2. Cal Poly (94)
  • 3. USF (93)
  • 4. UCLA (87)
  • 5. Santa Clara (74)
  • 6. San Diego St. (72)
  • T7. UCSD (69)
  • T7. Davis (69)
  • 9. San Diego (64)
  • 10. Stanford (62)
  • 11. Sac St. (45)
  • 12. Cal (44)
  • 13. Sonoma (41)
  • 14. LMU (38)
  • 15. Fullerton (34)
  • 16. USC (22)
  • 17. Nevada-Reno (19)
  • 18. Long Beach (15)
  • T19. Chico St. (14)
  • T19. Irvine (14)
Women’s D2 Preseason Rankings – January 9, 2017
  • 1. UCLA I (123 pts)
  • 2. San Jose St. (120)
  • 3. Davis II (118)
  • 4. San Diego St. II (111)
  • 5. St. Mary’s (102)
  • 6. Fullerton II (97)
  • 7. Cal Poly Pomona (93)
  • 8. Cal Poly II (91)
  • 9. San Marcos (89)
  • 10. Sonoma St. II (74)
  • 11. Northridge (70)
  • T12. Point Loma (67)
  • T12. USC II (67)
  • 14. UCSB II (65)
  • 15. Pacific (64)
  • 16. Azusa Pacific (58)
  • 17. San Francisco St. (57)
  • 18. Irvine II (50)
  • 19. Riverside (32)
  • 20. Claremont (31)
  • 21. Fresno St (31)
  • 22. San Bernardino (24)
  • 23. Channel Islands (18)
  • 24. Mount St. Mary’s (13)
  • 25. William Jessup (10)
 

© California Collegiate Volleyball Conference, Inc.

Disclaimer: All information provided on the California Collegiate Volleyball Conference’s (CCVC) web site is provided for information purposes only. Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate information, CCVC makes no guarantees of any kind and cannot be held liable for any outdated or incorrect information. CCVC’s web site may contain information created and maintained by a variety of external sources, organizations, associations, or information providers. CCVC does not control, monitor or guarantee the accuracy of the information contained from these external sites and sources, and does not necessarily endorse any views expressed or products or services that may be offered therein. In no event should CCVC be responsible or liable directly or indirectly for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such information available on or through any such site or resource. Any information to external web sites linked to CCVC’s web site or other entities not associated with CCVC are provided as a courtesy. They should not be construed as an endorsement by CCVC of the content or views of the linked materials. All rights reserved. Contents on CCVC’s web site may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission of CCVC.

Powered by Warp Theme Framework