Posts Tagged ‘Rankings’

14 Mar 2016

Women’s D1 & D2 Rankings – March 11, 2016

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

Women’s D1 Rankings – March 11, 2016
- 1. Cal Poly (125 pts)
- 2. UC Davis (121)
- 3. UCLA (114)
- 4. UCSD (106)
- 5. UCSB (95)
- 6. Sonoma St (89)
- 7. Santa Clara (88)
- 8. Arizona (87)
- 9. Stanford (79)
- 10. San Diego St (71)
- 11. Long Beach (62)
- 12. LMU (58)
- 13. USC (56)
- 14. Cal (56)
- 15. Chico St (51)
- 16. San Jose St (28)
- 17. Arizona St (26)
- 18. San Diego (25)
- 19. Fullerton (21)
- 20. UC Irvine (18)
- 21. Nevada-Reno (10)

Women’s D2 Rankings – March 11, 2016
- 1. Cal Poly II (153 pts)
- 2. USF (152)
- 3. UC Davis II (145)
- 4. UCSB II (138)
- 5. Point Loma (117)
- 6. Azusa Pacific (116)
- 7. UCLA II (112)
- 8. San Francisco St (109)
- 9. Sacramento St (106)
- 10. USC II (93)
- T11. Fresno St (86)
- T11. Claremont (86)
- T13. Riverside (85)
- T13. San Diego St II (85)
- 15. Pomona (78)
- 16. Sonoma St II (75)
- 17. St. Mary’s (72)
- 18. Northridge (49)
- 19. Nevada-Reno II (47)
- T20. UC Irvine II (38)
- T20. San Marcos 38
- 22. Channel Islands (34)
- 23. Fullerton II (33)
- 24. San Jose St II (27)
- 25. Pacific (18)
- 26. Mount St. Mary’s (14)

Rankings for this period include all-league play up to 3/10/16, the Far Westerns Tournament at UC Davis, the MLK Tournament at San Jose St, and preseason results.
Las Vegas Open is March 18-19, 2016.
A point system is used in reverse order of ranking. That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on. Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.

27 Feb 2016

Women’s D1 & D2 Rankings, February 27, 2016

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

Women’s D1 Rankings – February 27, 2016
- 1. Cal Poly (125 pts)
- 2. Davis (121)
- 3. UCLA (112)
- 4. Sonoma St (101)
- 5. UCSB (97)
- 6. UCSD (94)
- 7. Stanford (90)
- 8. Arizona (88)
- 9. Santa Clara (78)
- 10. San Diego St (74)
- 11. USC (72)
- 12. Chico St (61)
- 13. Cal (50)
- 14. LMU (43)
- T15. Long Beach (37)
- T15. Arizona St (37)
- 17. San Jose St (34)
- 18. Fullerton (23)
- 19. San Diego (22)
- 20. Irvine (14)
- 21. Nevada-Reno (13)

Women’s D2 Rankings – February 27, 2016
- 1. Cal Poly II 151 (pts)
- 2. USF (150)
- 3. Davis II (149)
- 4. UCSB II (119)
- 5. San Francisco St (116)
- 6. Point Loma (113)
- 7. Azusa Pacific (112)
- 8. St. Mary’s (106)
- 9. Sacramento St (103)
- 10. UCLA II (96)
- 11. Fresno St (94)
- 12. Claremont (93)
- T13. San Diego St II (84)
- T13. Sonoma St II (84)
- 15. USC II (76)
- 16. Cal Poly Pomona (75)
- 17. Riverside (70)
- 18. Nevada-Reno II (69)
- 19. San Marcos (47)
- 20. Fullerton II (37)
- 21. Northridge (36)
- 22. Irvine II (34)
- 23. San Jose St II (33)
- 24. Channel Islands (28)
- 25. Pacific (19)
- 26. Mount St. Mary’s (7)

Rankings for this period include all-league play up to 2/26/16, the Far Westerns Tournament at UC Davis, the MLK Tournament at San Jose St, and preseason results.
Regional play in So-Cal this weekend so ranking changes coming heading into the Las Vegas Open.
A point system is used in reverse order of ranking. That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on. Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.

12 Feb 2016

Women’s D1 & D2 February 12, 2016 Rankings

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

Women’s D1 Rankings – February 12, 2016
- 1. Davis (125)
- 2. UCLA (114)
- 3. Cal Poly (111)
- 4. UCSB (108)
- 5. Arizona (100)
- 6. Santa Clara (96)
- 7. Stanford (83)
- 8. UCSD (79)
- 9. Cal (69)
- 10. Chico St (68)
- 11. Sonoma St (67)
- 12. San Diego St (62)
- T13. San Jose St (43)
- T13. Arizona St (43)
- T13. Long Beach (43)
- 16. USC (42)
- 17. LMU (40)
- 18. Fullerton (32)
- 19. Irvine (29)
- 20. Nevada-Reno (17)
- 21. San Diego (15)

Women’s D2 Rankings – February 12, 2016
- 1. Davis II (159 pts)
- 2. Cal Poly II (152)
- 3. USF (146)
- 4. Sacramento St (140)
- 5. UCSB II (135)
- 6. Fresno St (123)
- 7. UCLA II (118)
- 8. Azusa Pacific (115)
- 9. Sonoma St II (108)
- 10. St. Mary’s (103)
- 11. San Francisco St (93)
- 12. San Diego St II (90)
- 13. Claremont (88)
- 14. Point Loma (81)
- 15. Irvine II (68)
- T16. San Jose St II (65)
- T16. Riverside (65)
- 18. Nevada-Reno II (63)
- 19. San Marcos (61)
- 20. USC II (57)
- 21. Pomona (52)
- 22. Fullerton II (46)
- T23. Northridge (39)
- T23. Pacific (39)
- 25. Channel Islands (36)
- 26. Mount St. Mary’s (7)

Rankings for this period include all-league play up to 2/12/16, the MLK Tournament at San Jose St, and preseason results.
Big matches this weekend at UCSB in So-Cal, and all Nor-Cal teams play at St. Mary’s College in Moraga.
A point system is used in reverse order of ranking. That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on. Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.

30 Jan 2016

Women’s D1 & D2 January 30, 2016 Rankings

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

Women’s D1 Rankings – January 30, 2016
- 1. Davis (126 pts)
- 2. Cal Poly (120)
- T3. Arizona (109)
- T3. UCLA (109)
- 5. UCSB (106)
- 6. Stanford (94)
- 7. Sonoma St. (83)
- T8. Cal (74)
- T8. Irvine (74)
- 10. San Jose St (70)
- 11. Santa Clara (68)
- 12. Arizona St (64)
- 13. San Diego St (57)
- 14. UCSD (55)
- 15. USC (41)
- 16. LMU (32)
- 17. Nevada-Reno (30)
- 18. Long Beach (25)
- 19. Fullerton (22)
- 20. Chico St (18)
- 21. San Diego (9)

Women’s D2 Rankings – January 30, 2016
- 1. Davis II (133 pts)
- 2. Cal Poly II (126)
- 3. Sacramento St (120)
- 4. USF (117)
- 5. Fresno St (113)
- 6. UCLA II (110)
- 7. UCSB II (103)
- 8. St. Mary’s (102)
- 9. Sonoma St II (95)
- 10. Irvine II (87)
- 11. San Jose St II (75)
- 12. Azusa Pacific (74)
- 13. USC II (69)
- 14. Nevada-Reno II (67)
- 15. San Diego St II (65)
- T16. Point Loma (60)
- T16. San Marcos (60)
- 18. Riverside (50)
- 19. San Francisco St (48)
- 20. Fullerton II (45)
- 21. Pomona (44)
- 22. Northridge (35)
- 23. Pacific (32)
- 24. Channel Islands (20)
- 25. Claremont (19)
- 26. San Bernardino (14)
- 27. Mount St. Mary’s (7)

Rankings for this period include the MLK Tournament at San Jose St and preseason results. We expect a big shake-up after So-Cal and Nor-Cal matches this weekend.
A point system is used in reverse order of ranking. That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on. Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points.

07 Jan 2016

Women’s D1 and D2 Preseason Rankings

Written by ccvcvoll. Posted in News

Women’s D1 Preseason Rankings – January 7, 2016
- 1. Cal Poly (141 pts)
- 2. Davis (140)
- 3. Arizona (136)
- 4. UCSB (104)
- 5. USC (103)
- 6. Cal (100)
- 7. UCLA (98)
- 8. San Diego St (97)
- 9. UCSD (82)
- 10. ASU (75)
- 11. Stanford (72)
- 12. Irvine (63)
- 13. Sonoma St (54)
- 14. Santa Clara (50)
- 15. San Jose St (50)
- 16. Nevada-Reno (47)
- 17. Fullerton (44)
- 18. LMU (36)
- 19. Long Beach (32)
- 20. Chico St (24)
- 21. San Diego (22)
Women’s D2 Preseason Rankings – January 7, 2016
- 1. Cal Poly II (185)
- 2. USF (171)
- 3. Davis II (167)
- 4. UCSB II (160)
- 5. USC II (158)
- 6. Sac. St (135)
- 7. St. Mary’s (132)
- 8. Nevada-Reno II (129)
- 9. San Marcos (121)
- 10. Sonoma St II (115)
- 11. San Diego St II (113)
- 12. UCLA II (107)
- 13. Point Loma (100)
- 14. Azusa Pacific (94)
- 15. Pomona (80)
- 16. Irvine II (80)
- 17. Fresno St (74)
- 18. Fullerton II (74)
- 19. SF State (66)
- 20. Northridge (64)
- 21. Pacific (63)
- 22. San Jose St II (62)
- 23. Claremont (57)
- 24. Channel Islands (55)
- 25. Riverside (41)
- 26. Mount St Mary’s (27)
- 27. San Bernardino (16)
Rankings are determined by the 7 members of the CCVC Ranking Panel. The names of the panel members are under the Ranking tab. Each member ranks teams from top to bottom. A point system is used in reverse order of ranking. That is, if there are 20 teams, a 1st place vote is worth 20 points, 2nd place is worth 19 points, and so on. Total points are counted for each team and then teams are ranked based on total points. No set criteria is used for ranking teams, although panel members use a combination of objective and subjective criteria. Each panel member uses results (objective) from the season to assist with their determination (subjective). There are no restrictions on how to vote.

First «123 4 5 »Last